PRESS RELEASE September 21, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 21, 2020

Federal Railway Administration Issues Record of Decision and Regulatory Carve Out for “Conceptual Design” of Dallas Houston HSR

Jewett, TX – The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has released a pre-publication of its final Rule of Particular Applicability (RPA) and Record of Decision (ROD) today, Monday, September 21, 2020. However, the final RPA and ROD have not been published in the Federal Register. The final RPA and ROD, one of many remaining milestones within the overall regulatory process––including the NEPA process––does not “permit construction or operations,” despite Texas Central Railway’s best efforts to describe the proposed HSR as “shovel ready.” Rather, the final RPA and ROD simply enable FRA to reach a decision that is informed by a cursory understanding of the potential environmental impacts and safety requirements Texas Central Railway (TCR) will be mandated to operate by.

“FRA does not grant any kind of construction approval or permit. Neither does this final rule, by itself, grant any permission or authority for TCRR [Texas Central] to operate.”
– excerpt from FRA’s pre-published final RPA and ROD, page 15

When considering the overall impact of the final RPA and ROD to the timeline of the project, it is worth noting that FRA concluded the project was in a “conceptual design” stage and does not grant any kind of construction approval or permit. Rendering this decision less than conclusory, FRA expressly states that “neither does this final rule, by itself, grant any permission or authority for TCR to operate.” It is the Surface Transportation Board (STB) that is the only agency that can grant TCR permits to operate and construct since taking jurisdiction over the project on July 16, 2020. And considering the STB via that decision is requiring TCR to submit a full application to the Board, which includes a detailed look at project financials, design, construction plans, and ridership numbers, TCR is years away from construction and operation. This point is highlighted within FRA’s final RPA and ROD, where FRA denied TCR’s waiver to substitute non-compliant Japanese rolling stock, mandated compliance with crash readiness standards along with full Positive Train Control (PTC) compliance; thus meaning, TCR must do a complete redesign of their rolling stock in order to be compliant with this final RPA before they are even able to submit final designs for an STB application for construction and operational permits, which could potentially cost TCR tens of millions of dollars in additional costs.

Kyle Workman, Chairman and President of Texans Against HSR, said of the FRA ROD, “Texas Central will likely trumpet this decision as major progress for its project, but they are simply arranging deckchairs on the Titanic…Texans and federal taxpayers need to know this Record of Decision doesn’t change the fact that Texas Central has put up Texas land as collateral to the Japanese government when the project fails, while at the same time asking for billions in federal dollars to prop up its so-called ‘private project’ that is already failing in its ‘conceptual design’ stage.”

While Texas Central Railway continues to claim it will begin construction next year, the company has recently laid off the majority of its staff, admitted the cost estimate for the project has ballooned to $30B, expressed its intent to seek federal funds for a project they have called “private” and “not needing any public funds,” and has yet to file the required full application for construction approval to the federal-level Surface Transportation Board.

In short, the final RPA and ROD establish the minimum safety requirements with which TCR must comply while signifying the completion of the NEPA process. The publication of this final RPA and ROD is the beginning, not the end, of TCR’s regulatory journey. In addition, these final agency actions clear the way for legal challenges regarding, among other NEPA violations, the FRA’s failure to take the requisite “hard look” at the project’s environmental impacts, reasonable alternatives, and financial feasibility.

###

PRESS RELEASE September 15, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 15, 2020
Contact: Desi Porter
Email: info@TexansAgainstHSR.com

Texas Central Railway Deeds Texas Property To The Japanese Government

Jewett, Texas – Despite its claim to be a Texas company building a Texas project to benefit the people of Texas, public documents show Texas Central Railway has deeded property from Texas landowners to the Japanese government through an offshore entity set up in the Cayman Islands.

Based on a series of recently recorded real property transactions in counties along the affected route, it appears the Japanese government required Texas Central to put up the land as collateral for the sizeable loan owed to them. In each county (LeonWallerMadisonHarrisGrimes, Dallas, Ellis, etc.), Texas Central filed a “Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing” relating to property owned by Texas Central in that county. The beneficiary of these Deeds of Trust is an offshore entity named “Japan Texas High-Speed Railway Cayman GP.” Texas Central did not disclose the existence of this offshore beneficiary to any of the landowners it convinced to sign an option contract. Nor did it disclose its plans to use the property purchased through the option contracts to secure a loan from the Japanese government.

Adding to the serious concern of several elected officials from the local to federal levels, Texans Against HSR chair and president, Kyle Workman, explained that this latest deceptive action is one in a long string that landowners need to be made aware of. “Texas Central has long touted itself as a Texas company and a Texas project. Yet, some of the first Texas property it acquired was immediately deeded to an offshore shell company created by the Japanese government.”

Workman continued, “If Texas Central had disclosed their intent to deed this property to the government of Japan, lawmakers and landowners most likely would have considered these real estate transactions differently. There are still landowners with pending option contracts with Texas Central…these Texans must be notified immediately that the property Texas Central has acquired is being used as collateral to secure a loan from a foreign government. We ask that the Governor support measures to protect Texas land from being deceptively acquired and transferred into the shadows of offshore ownership, beyond the regulatory protections of US and Texas law.”

While Texas Central Railway continues to claim it will begin construction next year, the company has recently laid off the majority of its staff, admitted the cost estimate for the project has ballooned to $30B, expressed its intent to seek federal funds for a project they have called “private” and “not needing any public funds,” and is now being required by the federal-level Surface Transportation Board to file a full application including financial and ridership information, which the company has refused to make public thus far.

Additionally, the Federal Railroad Administration is set to publish its Record of Decision (ROD) related to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for this HSR project on Friday. This ROD does not give the company the needed permission to construct; however, it is considered a final federal action for the project, allowing lawsuits regarding FEIS NEPA violations to begin.

###

PRESS RELEASE September 15, 2020

Texas Central Railway Deeds Texas Property
To The Japanese Government

Jewett, TX – Despite its claim to be a Texas company building a Texas project to benefit the people of Texas, public documents show Texas Central Railway has deeded property from Texas landowners to the Japanese government through an offshore entity set up in the Cayman Islands.

Based on a series of recently recorded real property transactions in counties along the affected route, it appears the Japanese government required Texas Central to put up the land as collateral for the sizeable loan owed to them. In each county (Leon, Waller, Madison, Harris, Grimes, Dallas, Ellis, etc.), Texas Central filed a “Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing” relating to property owned by Texas Central in that county. The beneficiary of these Deeds of Trust is an offshore entity named “Japan Texas High-Speed Railway Cayman GP.” Texas Central did not disclose the existence of this offshore beneficiary to any of the landowners it convinced to sign an option contract. Nor did it disclose its plans to use the property purchased through the option contracts to secure a loan from the Japanese government.

Adding to the serious concern of several elected officials from the local to federal levels, Texans Against HSR chair and president, Kyle Workman, explained that this latest deceptive action is one in a long string that landowners need to be made aware of. “Texas Central has long touted itself as a Texas company and a Texas project. Yet, some of the first Texas property it acquired was immediately deeded to an offshore shell company created by the Japanese government.”

Workman continued, “If Texas Central had disclosed their intent to deed this property to the government of Japan, lawmakers and landowners most likely would have considered these real estate transactions differently. There are still landowners with pending option contracts with Texas Central…these Texans must be notified immediately that the property Texas Central has acquired is being used as collateral to secure a loan from a foreign government. We ask that the Governor support measures to protect Texas land from being deceptively acquired and transferred into the shadows of offshore ownership, beyond the regulatory protections of US and Texas law.”

While Texas Central Railway continues to claim it will begin construction next year, the company has recently laid off the majority of its staff, admitted the cost estimate for the project has ballooned to $30B, expressed its intent to seek federal funds for a project they have called “private” and “not needing any public funds,” and is now being required by the federal-level Surface Transportation Board to file a full application including financial and ridership information, which the company has refused to make public thus far.

Additionally, the Federal Railroad Administration is set to publish its Record of Decision (ROD) related to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for this HSR project on Friday. This ROD does not give the company the needed permission to construct; however, it is considered a final federal action for the project, allowing lawsuits regarding FEIS NEPA violations to begin.

###

PRESS RELEASE June 8, 2020

TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY SEEKING STIMULUS FUNDS

Texas Central Execs Explore Federal Dollars While Feds Limit Taxpayer

Jewett, Texas – New revelations regarding funding for the embattled Dallas Houston HSR have come to light over the last several days when a letter from Drayton McLane, Texas Central Railway’s Chairman and main investor, revealed that the project has “hit a snag” and is now estimated to cost $30B, which is a 300% cost increase since the project was first announced and a 150% increase from the project cost currently shown on the Federal Railroad Administration project dashboard. However, Texas Central is apparently not worried about this enormous cost increase because they “hope to receive [monies] from President Trump’s infrastructure stimulus through the Department of Transportation,” despite, for nearly a decade, touting the project to the public, elected officials, and the media as a “privately funded project” to create a more favorable public perception.

First to highlight the letter describing Texas Central’s changes in funding plans was a Dallas Business Journal’s article by Evan Hoopfer, who has closely followed the Dallas Houston HSR, reporting that in response to McLane’s letter, Carlos Aguilar, CEO of Texas Central, admitted, “We don’t know whether [private equity is] going to be there or not. It depends on the markets themselves to determine if and how much of the money can come from private equity. And that’s why it could require some stimulus money, but we don’t know yet.”

John Fund, a nationally-known and well-respected journalist who has often spoken out on the reality of this proposed HSR’s failed future, weighed in on the admission that the project will seek federal funding in an article entitled, “This Is Exactly the Wrong Time for Another High-Speed Train Boondoggle.” Fund explained that “government loans are often forgiven or forgotten, with taxpayers left holding the bag.”

Kyle Workman, Chairman and President of Texans Against HSR, said, “Texas Central has already used the pandemic to explain away laying off the majority of their staff, and now we find out they are using it to make up for their lack of private investment.” Workman added, “We’ve heard that Mr. McLane has been busy asking for every public funding opportunity available in DC. Stimulus funds, RRIF loans that are rarely paid back, and then, ironically timed, a former Texas Central employee now US Representative from Massachusetts recently authored a bill for $205B in funding for HSR, specifically including Texas Central’s project. The depths to which Texas Central will go to get public funds for their ‘private project’ reveals what we have known all along… this project cannot be privately funded.”

The timing of Texas Central’s shift to rely on public funding is underscored by the exclusion of public hearings on matters of safety and environmental impacts for this HSR project. Texas State Representative Ben Leman shared in his recent opinion editorial that he and other state legislators, as well as Texas’ own Department of Transportation, requested postponement of public hearings until a time that the public could fully participate in person. Instead, the Federal Railroad Administration moved forward with telephonic hearings that were poorly promoted and suffered connection issues. Rep. Leman said, “I hope you will join me in rising up in defense of democracy and protecting our taxpayer dollars. I ask you to call upon  [Transportation] Secretary Elaine Chao and ask why the USDOT is supporting Texas Central’s $30B proposed project, when Texas Central is seeking billions in taxpayer dollars, without adequate involvement from the very taxpayers potentially footing the bill.”

###

Download / Print

PRESS RELEASE May 29, 2020

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 29, 2020
Contact: Desi Porter
Email: desi@TexansAgainstHSR.com

FRA Final Environmental Impact Statement Published

This morning, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Dallas Houston HSR. While this represents a milestone in the project timeline, this is not a permit to construct or operate the project. Per FRA, it is simply a blueprint for what the company must do if it were to build an HSR.

Kyle Workman said about the FEIS publication, “This is not a done deal. There are still many obstacles the project must overcome; namely, the Texas Supreme Court appeal of the Miles case regarding the company’s eminent domain status, raising $30B for a project that is embattled with legal and land acquisition issues, and the Surface Transportation Board’s lack of jurisdiction that would provide the otherwise absent regulatory framework needed to make this project possible, just to name a few.”

In the coming days, Texans Against HSR’s legal teams, landowners, and experts will be reviewing the 10,000-page document to identify all the errors, omissions, and areas of concern to be submitted to the FRA.

Workman added, “During this unprecedented time of COVID-19 restrictions, the Federal Railroad Administration has proactively excluded Texas landowners, especially those Texans most impacted by this project, from providing legally required feedback on their work. This project is not shovel-ready, not financially vetted, and not worthy of federal taxpayer dollars, no matter if it’s in the form of grants, loans, or stimulus funds. The State of Texas has made it clear, no State funds for “private” high-speed rail; the federal government should follow suit.”

###

PRESS RELEASE May 8, 2020

COURT OF APPEALS HSR RULING SETS
DANGEROUS EMINENT DOMAIN PRECEDENT

Jewett, Texas – Jim and Barbara Miles, of Leon County, learned Thursday that in their legal fight  to protect their ranch and private property rights from the proposed high-speed rail project, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Texas Central and its newly-formed affiliate ITL, stating that both entities are railroad companies and interurban electric railways under Texas law. While this ruling was not the outcome the Miles expected, the companies still cannot access or condemn their property, as the Miles will be appealing the ruling to the Texas Supreme Court.

Blake Beckham, the Miles’ attorney and Special Litigation Counsel to Texans Against HSR (TAHSR), said, “If ever there was a ruling that created ‘the Wild, Wild, West’ of eminent domain authority, this is it. This ruling creates a dangerous precedent that would allow anybody with $300 and a computer to immediately obtain the extraordinary power of eminent domain by simply filing papers with the Texas Secretary of State self-declaring to be a railroad. This is not and cannot be the law in Texas.”

Kyle Workman, Chairman and President of TAHSR, said, “We are disappointed the Court of Appeals treated these fundamental private property rights, cherished by all Texans, with such disregard. This project’s cost estimate is now at $30B, the company has laid off the majority of its staff and still does not have the plans, permits or funds to move forward, so this project is far from shovel-ready as they claim. Jim and Barbara Miles are still in this fight, and we are standing with them, as should all Texans who value private property rights.”

To have the original ruling by Judge Deborah Evans that Texas Central and ITL are not railroads or interurban electric railways upheld, Jim and Barbara Miles will appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, which has consistently and repeatedly recognized the importance of private property rights in Texas. “This Court of Appeals ruling has only strengthened our resolve to keep fighting to protect not only our property but the private property rights of all Texans. We are hopeful the Supreme Court will see how this ruling could open a Pandora’s Box of eminent domain issues in Texas. They simply cannot allow this Appeals Court ruling to stand.”

Landowners should know Texas Central still has no right on their private property at this time. While TAHSR suspects Texas Central will try to use this ruling to enter private property for surveys and other activities or try to secure additional funding for the project, until the Texas Supreme Court issues a final, unappealable ruling, Texas Central cannot condemn private property.

###

Download / Print