by flex.202 | Oct 15, 2021 | Press Releases |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 15, 2021
Contact: Desi Burns Porter
desi@TexansAgainstHSR.com
TEXAS SUPREME COURT WITHDRAWS DENIAL, REVERSES COURSE AND REINSTATES LANDOWNER PETITION AGAINST TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY
Motion for Rehearing by Jim Miles was granted by Texas Supreme Court, Proposed HSR eminent domain authority remains in question
Jewett, Texas – In what happens in only 3% of denied petitions before the Texas Supreme Court, Leon County landowner Jim Miles, whose ranch is impacted by the proposed Dallas Houston HSR, was granted his Motion for Rehearing today. The Court withdrew the denial of Miles’ petition for review from June 2021 and reinstated Miles’ petition for review. Miles’ motion for rehearing can be found here.
Miles’ motion for rehearing was supported widely with a dozen Amici letters to the Court and garnered attention from across the State and DC. Elected officials, statewide agriculture organizations including Texas Farm Bureau and Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, as well as Texas businesses, ranches, and landowners each encouraged the Court to hear the case focusing on the legal issues within the petition. Nine amici were submitted in support of Texas Central with simple overarching messages of support for the project.
Fortunately for Jim and Barbara Miles, the case is not a referendum on the project, but on the merits of the case, namely private property rights.
After learning the news today of the Court’s granting of the motion for rehearing, Barbara Miles said, “We are as committed today as we have been each day of this fight. This is about our private property rights and the rights of all Texans to enjoy and work our little pieces of Texas…unencumbered by a project that has been years in the making with nothing to show for it. We are elated that the Court has agreed to review our petition and are looking forward to our day in court.”
The Court will hear oral argument on January 11, 2022.
###
by flex.202 | Aug 17, 2021 | Press Releases |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 17, 2021
Contact: Desi Burns Porter
desi@TexansAgainstHSR.com
TEXAS AGRICULTURE and FEDERAL/STATE OFFICIALS STAND WITH LANDOWNER TO PROTECT RANCH FROM DANGEROUS EMINENT DOMAIN RULING
Texas Ag Commissioner, Members of Congress, State Legislators, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, and Texas Businesses Ask Texas Supreme Court To Hear Landowner Appeal And Reverse Dangerous Eminent Domain Ruling
Jewett, Texas – Texas’ top agricultural officials and organizations are lining up to support Leon County landowners Jim and Barbara Miles’ legal efforts to protect their ranch from Texas Central Railway’s proposed Dallas to Houston high-speed rail project. In the trial court, Judge Deborah Oakes Evans ruled in favor of the Miles’, finding that Texas Central does not have eminent domain authority as a railroad or an interurban electric railway. Judge Evans also found that ITL, an entity created in the middle of the lawsuit, does not have eminent domain either. The Corpus Christi Court of Appeals reversed that ruling, finding that both Texas Central and ITL are railroads and interurbans with eminent domain authority. The Texas Supreme Court recently denied the Miles’ petition for review of the court of appeals’ opinion earlier this summe; so late last month, the Miles’ filed a motion for rehearing asking the Texas Supreme Court to grant review and affirm Judge Evan’s ruling.
Blake Beckham, the Miles’ attorney and Special Litigation Counsel for Texans Against HSR, said, “If ever there was a ruling that created ‘the Wild, Wild West’ of eminent domain abuse, this is it—the court of appeals’ ruling creates a dangerous precedent that would allow anybody with $300 and a computer to immediately obtain the extraordinary power of eminent domain by filing papers with the Texas Secretary of State falsely claiming to be a railroad or an interurban. This is not and cannot be the law in Texas.”
Texas Farm Bureau said in its amicus brief to the Court, “This is an important case that deserves review. The issues in this case are exceptional in scope and reach, and important to the citizens and landowners of this state. They will affect rural landowners directly and often, for practical reasons.” (Full text here.)
Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association told the Court, “These private development projects not only destroy the meaningful use and character of the land, but they do so without adequate due process. The courts, therefore, are the landowner’s last and best hope for ensuring the continued constitutional protection of private property rights when the next privately-funded project comes knocking at their door.” (Full text here.)
Texas Commissioner of Agriculture Sid Miller also weighed in: “The project will devastate thousands and thousands of acres of agricultural and special status farmland that is already under constant threat of eminent domain. Landowners who devote their entire lives and all their resources to their farms and ranches, and who rely on the use of their land for income, should not be at the mercy of private actors falsely claiming eminent domain authority, like Texas Central has done here.” (Full text here.)
Members of Congress, Representative Kevin Brady and recently-elected Representative Jake Ellzey, are both staunchly opposed to the proposed HSR. Congressman Brady said of the project, “I am deeply concerned that Texas Central is proposing to seize Texans’ ranches, farms, and homes—against their will—while the project is still in its planning stages. I will always support infrastructure that supports growth and transportation improvements. However, granting eminent domain to Texas Central would not only violate the freedoms of property owners but fail to protect the taxpayer.”
Congressman Ellzey said in his letter to the Court, “Private property rights are sacred, and I do believe that the issues raised in this case are critically important to every Texas landowner. For these reasons, I wanted to write this letter in solidarity with my former [Texas Legislature] colleagues and on behalf of myself and my constituents. I respectfully request that the Court grant Mr. Miles’ petition for review.”
Texas State legislators, including Representatives Ben Leman, Cecil Bell Jr., Cody Harris, Kyle Kacal, Will Metcalf, Trent Ashby, Steve Toth, Tom Oliverson, and James White, and Senators Lois Kolkhorst, Charles Schwertner, and Brian Birdwell, emphasized to the Court its role in protecting private property rights: “This Court has repeatedly, recently, and unanimously recognized that strong judicial protection for individual property rights is essential to freedom itself. Therefore, we not only call upon this Court to once again ensure that the property rights of individual landowners are protected from the attempted abuse of eminent domain by private actors, but especially when on behalf of a foreign government.” (Full text here.)
Texans Against HSR President Trey Duhon noted, “Texas Central is not a railroad or interurban electric railway. Texas Central is merely a promoter of a high-speed rail project that is running on empty. If private entities like Texas Central can so easily obtain eminent domain authority in Texas, the door will be wide open for more landowner abuse, while complicating eminent domain rights for those that legitimately have it.”
The Miles’ motion to rehear was also supported by numerous Texas businesses, including KSA Industries Inc., and private landowners.
Background – Jim Miles originally sued Texas Central in March 2016 to end its harassment and efforts to survey his private property. After Texas Central lost a case against another landowner in Harris County, Texas Central created a shell company, ITL, in an attempt to fix the legal problems it had encountered while trying to prove eminent domain authority in court. ITL then sued Miles despite having never contacted him in any manner whatsoever. Miles didn’t even know ITL existed. Judge Evans saw though Texas Central’s nonsense and signed a final judgment in favor of Miles and against Texas Central and ITL.
When the court of appeals reversed Judge Evans’ ruling, Jim and Barbara were even more resolved to continue the fight to protect their property rights and those of other landowners. “We’re going to take this all the way. Texans take their private property rights seriously and we know the Texas Supreme Court does too. We cannot allow private companies to take our land through self-declared eminent domain authority.”
Miles’ Texas Supreme Court briefs, prepared by Jeff Levinger and Carl Cecere of Levinger PC, Blake Beckham and Patrick McShan of The Beckham Group, Dylan Drummond of Gray Reed, and Jason Sodd and Jody McSpadden of Dawson Sodd, states, “the court of appeals authorized private companies with no railroad experience, no tracks, no trains, and only a fraction of the money needed to build a high-speed railway system, to trample with impunity on the property rights of thousands of Texans.”
Miles argued that only the Texas Supreme Court “can prevent the irreparable harm likely to result if [Texas Central and ITL]’s unlawful exercise of eminent domain power is allowed to play out to its inevitable failure. All are looking to this Court to prevent that result. It is essential that the Court do so, because the court of appeals’ opinion upends the critical legislative and judicial protections against the unrestrained exercise of eminent domain authority by undercapitalized and inexperienced private actors like [Texas Central and ITL].”
The Texas Supreme Court denied Miles’ petition for review in June 2021 with only seven of nine justices participating. Miles’ motion for rehearing can be found here.
###
by flex.202 | May 5, 2021 | Press Releases |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 5, 2021
Contact: Desi Burns Porter
desi@TexansAgainstHSR.com
***MEDIA ALERT***MEDIA ALERT***MEDIA ALERT***
WALLER COUNTY JUDGE TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS ON HSR
WHAT: The United States House of Representatives’ Transportation and Infrastructure (T&I) Committee is holding a hearing on “When Unlimited Potential Meets Limited Resources: The Benefits and Challenges of High-Speed Rail and Emerging Rail Technologies”
WHO: Waller County Judge Trey Duhon, along with executives representing Amtrak, and HSR, hyperloop, and maglev technologies. Full witness list can be found on the committee website here.
WHEN: THURSDAY, MAY 6, 2021; 11:00 AM EASTERN
WHERE: 2167 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC; Virtually here
WHY: Given his role as county executive, Judge Duhon was invited to speak at the T&I hearing to offer his perspective of the Texas Central Railway proposed high-speed rail project and the challenges created for local governments and private landowners.
###
by flex.202 | Apr 29, 2021 | Press Releases |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 29, 2021
TEXAS LEGISLATURE PROTECTS STATE FUNDS FROM DELAYED, OVER BUDGET HIGH-SPEED RAIL NOW SEEKING PUBLIC FUNDING
Jewett, Texas – As the Texas Legislature finalizes its State budget in the last 30 days of the regular legislative session, the language protecting the State from subsidizing the prolonged high-speed rail proposal remains in the budget.
Both the Texas Senate and House have completed debating their respective versions of the State budget that included commitment to education, fully funding teacher retirement, increasing funding for healthcare initiatives and maintaining their responsibility for border security.
The House budget version included $246.8 Billion in total spending, which marks an $18 Billion decrease in spending from the previous budget.
The budget now heads to a conference debate between select members of the Senate and House budget-writing committees to hash out differences between the two bills passed by each chamber. The final bill delivered by that conference committee will be what members vote on to approve the State’s budget for the next two years.
In addition to a law created in 2017, the high-speed rail budget rider ensures holding the promoter of the proposed Dallas Houston high-speed rail to its word that no State funds or resources will be utilized on the monopolized Japanese high-speed rail plan proposed by Texas Central Railway.
Representative Ben Leman (R-Iola) said of the budget rider, “The action of maintaining a rider in the State budget is both responsible government and a reminder that private HSR projects must find its funding in the market, not the State budget. We, state legislators, are in the business of protecting taxpayers and Texas landowners, and that is exactly what we did with this rider.”
Representative Cody Harris (R-Palestine) offered words of precaution, saying, “If the Biden administration is actually able to get the US Congress to pass infrastructure legislation, they should think twice about spending taxpayer dollars with no State matching funds. The market has made it clear that investing in the Texas Central high-speed rail project isn’t a great idea, and Texas has been abundantly clear…we are not investing in it, either.”
With the proposed HSR mired in financial distress and legal issues, including the question of its right to eminent domain authority being clarified by the Texas Supreme Court, Senator Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham) said, “If the federal government wants high-speed rail in Texas, they need to know that Texas taxpayers are not going to subsidize the taking of private land.”
With other critical needs within the State, like an electrical grid overhaul, members of the Texas Legislature have shown true leadership by preserving the budget rider that protects Texas landowners and taxpayers.
###
by flex.202 | Apr 14, 2021 | Press Releases |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 14, 2021
TEXAS COUNTIES AND LANDOWNERS SUE BUTTIGIEG, FRA, AND US DOT IN FEDERAL COURT OVER HSR NEPA VIOLATIONS
Texas HSR project in jeopardy as lawsuit seeks to vacate and set aside Federal Railroad Administration’s Final EIS and special regulatory carve-out for Japanese HSR technology.
Jewett, Texas – Today, Texans Against High-Speed Rail (TAHSR), ten landowners, and six Texas Counties filed a federal court lawsuit challenging the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) Record of Decision approving its Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Dallas to Houston high-speed rail (HSR). In 2014, FRA said it would be preparing an EIS to study the impacts of constructing and operating the proposed HSR. In 2020, FRA suddenly changed course, claiming it had prepared its EIS to study the impacts of a special set of safety rules that apply only to the proposed Japanese Shinkansen HSR technology. FRA now claims this new “rule of particular applicability” (RPA) would allow the Shinkansen technology to be deployed anywhere in the U.S.
Led by TAHSR Special Litigation Counsel Blake Beckham and Patrick McShan of The Beckham Group, environmental attorneys Jim Blackburn and David Kahne, and eminent domain specialists Glenn Sodd, Jason Sodd, Jody McSpadden, and Clint Schumacher of Dawson & Sodd, Texas landowners and Counties joined forces to challenge FRA’s blatant, yet nuanced, violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Administrative Procedure Act, both of which were designed to promote transparency, informed decision-making, and full and fair opportunity for comment by affected persons. The lawsuit details FRA’s numerous unlawful actions, resulting in a Final EIS that failed to evaluate all reasonable alternatives to the HSR and all potential adverse environmental impacts.
Blackburn, who teaches environmental law at Rice University, said, “My biggest concern is that a federal agency undertook an action to authorize construction and operation of this HSR across private property when it lacked authority to approve construction or operation. That is not only unlawful but simply wrong. Add to that the fact that this is one of the worst environmental analyses I have encountered in my 45 years as an environmental lawyer and you have a real mess that belongs before a federal judge. These private grasslands are among our nation’s greatest natural assets. We must protect them from wrongful actions.”
Kyle Workman, president of TAHSR, said, “The Final EIS is riddled with errors and issues that were never addressed, including adverse environmental impacts and social disparities. The damage began years ago and continued through to the RPA. This was a bait and switch, not only on the people of Texas but all Americans. FRA neglected to properly study the impacts on Texas and now it is attempting to use its deficient study to allow a foreign government to bypass NEPA’s requirements and deploy its incompatible technology anywhere in the U.S. FRA’s actions should concern the entire nation.”
Harris County landowner and plaintiff Calvin House said, “Agents for the promoters of this HSR came to my property six times asking for a survey, and every time I told them no. So, they sued me, but the court ruled in my favor. That didn’t stop FRA from trespassing on my property and including the information illegally collected in its Final EIS. I’m proud to be a part of this lawsuit so we can right these wrongs.”
Waller County Judge Trey Duhon offered, “Waller County has tried to coordinate fully with FRA to ensure our County was studied properly for current and future impacts this HSR project would have in our area. Not only was County property taken illegally for survey use, FRA refused to meet with County officials to safeguard our roads, floodways, and future growth. With these and other NEPA violations of this Project, the only solution for relief is to rescind the EIS and remove the special safety rules created.”
Plaintiffs include the Counties of Grimes, Freestone, Leon, Madison, Navarro, and Waller, and landowners Ronny Caldwell, Calvin House, Donovan Maretick, David and Heather Miseldine, Ronald and Becky Scasta, Gene and Michaelle Whitesides, and Logan Wilson III.
The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division, can be seen here: https://rb.gy/ehmrku
###
